Mercedes AMG GT 63 vs Porsche 911 Turbo S: All-Wheel Drive GTs Head to Head 
 
 becomes 

 Mercedes AMG GT 63 vs Porsche 911 Turbo S
Mercedes AMG GT 63 vs Porsche 911 Turbo S: All-Wheel Drive GTs Head to Head becomes Mercedes AMG GT 63 vs Porsche 911 Turbo S

Mercedes AMG GT 63 vs Porsche 911 Turbo S: All-Wheel Drive GTs Head to Head becomes Mercedes AMG GT 63 vs Porsche 911 Turbo S

Mercedes-AMG GT 63 v Porsche 911 Turbo S: all-wheel drive GTs go head-to-head

The Mercedes-AMG GT 63 and the Porsche 911 Turbo S are two of the most desirable all-wheel-drive grand tourers on sale today. They are both incredibly quick, luxurious, and capable, but which one is better?

We’ve pitted these two German titans against each other in a comprehensive comparison to see which one comes out on top.

Performance

The Mercedes-AMG GT 63 is powered by a 4.0-liter twin-turbocharged V8 engine that produces 577 horsepower and 590 lb-ft of torque. The Porsche 911 Turbo S gets a 3.8-liter twin-turbocharged flat-six that makes 640 horsepower and 590 lb-ft of torque.

On paper, the Porsche has a clear advantage in terms of power and torque. And it shows on the track: the 911 Turbo S can hit 60 mph from a standstill in just 2.6 seconds, while the GT 63 takes 3.1 seconds.

But the GT 63 isn’t just about straight-line speed. It has a more engaging handling character, thanks to its more balanced weight distribution and slightly sharper steering.

Both cars come with a sophisticated all-wheel-drive system that helps them put their power down effectively. But the 911’s system is more responsive and precise, making it the more capable car on a racetrack.

Design

Both the GT 63 and the 911 Turbo S are stunning to look at. But they take different approaches to their styling.

The GT 63 is all about elegance and muscularity. Its long, sloping hood, wide stance, and aggressive grille give it a predatory look. The 911 Turbo S is more streamlined and athletic. Its iconic curves and sloping roofline are instantly recognizable.

Ultimately, it comes down to personal preference. Some will prefer the more aggressive look of the GT 63, while others will appreciate the more classic style of the 911 Turbo S.

Interior

Both the GT 63 and the 911 Turbo S offer luxurious and driver-focused cabins. The GT 63 features a more spacious and opulent interior, with plenty of room for passengers in the back.

The 911 Turbo S’s interior is a bit more spartan but still very luxurious. Its low-slung seats and driver-oriented cockpit create a more intimate and focused driving experience.

Both cars offer a wide range of technology features, including navigation, adaptive cruise control, and a premium sound system. However, the GT 63’s system is more advanced and intuitive, offering more features and a more user-friendly interface.

Practicality

The GT 63 is more practical than the 911 Turbo S, thanks to its larger trunk and back seats that can actually fit adults. The 911’s back seats are only suitable for small children or luggage. This makes the GT 63 a more versatile option for those who need to carry more passengers or cargo.

Price

The Mercedes-AMG GT 63 starts at around $150,000, while the Porsche 911 Turbo S begins at about $200,000. Both cars can be optioned up to significantly higher prices depending on the desired features and upgrades.

Conclusion

So, which one is better? The answer, as with many comparisons, depends on your individual needs and preferences. If you prioritize ultimate performance and driver-focused thrills, the Porsche 911 Turbo S is the clear winner. It offers the more powerful engine, the more agile handling, and the more intense driving experience. However, the Mercedes-AMG GT 63 is the more luxurious, practical, and refined option. It’s the perfect blend of performance, comfort, and utility.

In the end, it’s up to you to decide which one suits you better. Both the Mercedes-AMG GT 63 and the Porsche 911 Turbo S are fantastic sports cars that will make any driving enthusiast happy.

Comments

No comments yet. Why don’t you start the discussion?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *